Showing posts with label ScholarPlus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ScholarPlus. Show all posts

Digital Journalism at The Lake

Student working on article
Looking at a small group of students, hunched over their individual Scholar+ Chromebooks, you may wonder what they are doing?  Is it a History assignment? Is it a project for Science? Perhaps an analysis for the latest assignment in English.  At Perris Lake High School, this small group of students are working on the school newspaper.

The newspaper, Nest Times at Perris Lake, has been using its current format for the past 2 years.  Using Haiku's Wiki Project forum, the students create individual ‘projects’ where they incorporate videos, links, text, and photos to create ‘mini’ Haiku pages on their selected topics.  These pages are then reviewed by the Instructor, and edited, before the pages are copied to the main public page of the Nest Times.

Why go digital you may ask?  Well, in these difficult times, schools, classes, and teachers are always striving for ways to provide opportunities for the students, but still stay within a budget.  Going digital was the obvious answer for Perris Lake High School.  Working closely with the Tech TOSA, the instructor was able to set up the basic structure of the online structure that exists today.  As a teacher new to the district, the instructor had been on a learning curve with her students, and together they have explored many subjects.  Along the way the students have learned to be more comfortable with the possibilities the Chromebook opens to them.  They have learned to discern which websites provide the most current, reliable information, and which sites are best left alone.  They have learned to explain their research to a casual observer and to give details to how it will be applied to their current article/project they are working on.

Students are allowed to pick their own topics, as long as they’re school appropriate.  With a small class ranging from 11 - 25, and with students that stay on campus for only a maximum of two years, it is important to tap into the interests and concerns of these students while they are here.  Their tastes are very eclectic.  The first term projects were done in groups. While it generated positive results, switching to an individual format allowed students to focus more on their topics; it also provided a wider variety of information, topics, and ideas. Students are given the ‘rights’ to look at each other’s projects to generate ideas and to help each other when requested.  Some students, who have been in Journalism in previous terms, are now proficient enough to help educate others.  These students have become leaders within the class.  At times, they have also helped to edit pages for final publication.

Image of collaborative story ideas on a whiteboard
Collaboration on story ideas
One topic choice, that is promoted heavily, is what to do following completion of high school.  Many students are using their projects to explore their choices beyond high school.  For some of these students, college is not always their first choice.  Having this opportunity to explore, about their different career possibles, gives students a better understanding about the type of education they will need.  Many have discovered that some form of a college degree is required for advancement in most of their chosen fields.  Also, they sometimes find that their personal interests have job/career aspects they had not known about before they started their research.  Finding these job/career interests can motivate the student and increase their focus on their future.

Group of student journalistsFeedback from the site has not been set up yet.  Some teachers have been generous with their praise, and their comments have been appreciated!  In the near future, The Nest will be setting up ways to provide more accurate feedback.  We are also looking to, perhaps, take requests on additional topics and materials the readers wish to see in the ‘paper’.  In addition, the Nest has been exploring options to draw more attention to the Newspaper’s site - perhaps a specially designed icon, or a more interesting form to draw attention to the paper when individuals are visiting and perusing the Perris Lake High School home page.  Next steps include establishing a Twitter account, attaching a link to the current Facebook account for PLHS, and to incorporate announcements that students will make daily.  We wish to create a more socially savvy connection for both students and the community. The staff is also planning to learn more about Haiku and investigate new ways to enhance the paper and organize it to become a more fluid site that is easier to navigate.

The team of teachers at Perris Lake High School are always striving for new ways to connect with their students and create an environment that is supportive and nurturing. Their online newspaper is another way to ‘hear’ the voice of the students and give them their own unique voice through written expression.


Coding is a Huge Hit with Pinacate Students!

Submitted by: Erik Anderson

Over the past 2 months, I have exposed my 7th and 8th grade Technology students to 3 different coding platforms: Scratch (along with Google CS First), Code Combat, and Codecademy.  As the year has progressed, the “results” from my perspective have been getting more and more exciting (though I have not given a single quiz or test for a grade).  Here is a detailed recap of the past 3 months, and a reflection on why I think this year is so super successful despite the lack of “evidence” that has been traditionally demanded of teachers in the era of NCLB.

I chose Scratch and CS First as the introductory coding unit because I thought that this would be a good way to scaffold the logic and analysis, and persistence, required to write good code when ultimately you are staring at nothing but a blank screen and a command prompt.  I had the students work on projects in the CS First unit “Social Media”, wherein they learned how to drag and drop blocks of code to create and call variables, produce loops, and the like.  This project-based unit did not demand that students learn any specific coding language, but focused on developing a more basic understanding of the connection between the magic of command (input) and result (output).  Most of the assets with which students worked were pre-supplied and organized by the program: sprites and different characters, tools, and even the commands themselves.  And, though the accompanying videos spelled out every step of every project, there was still plenty of room for students to stretch their understanding and to demonstrate their creativity in each project.  However, this platform has proven to be the least engaging of the three on which students have begun to spread their coding wings.  But, still, I think it whetted their appetites for what has happened since.

Code Combat was next, and a step in the right direction in terms of getting students to engage with the material and to get enthused about their performances.  Code Combat is an outstanding platform that teaches students a specific coding language (I chose to have the students work in Python).  To learn the language, students select a hero, which they maneuver through a series of levels in a Dungeons and Dragons style video game.  To complete each level, students must write the proper code to make their hero move, wield a weapon, use a shield, and find treasure.  If their code is wrong, their hero can’t make it to the end of the level.  As a student’s hero completes more and more levels, he (or she) starts to acquire more and more gems, which the hero can use to purchase upgraded weaponry, armor, and clothing.  All of these items carry the power of advanced coding options, which make completing each level easier.  The better and more advanced equipment one possesses, the more coding options one has for completing each level.  This basic structure keeps students’ motivation extremely high to continue in the game, and makes achievement highly rewarding.  I am so glad, in retrospect, that I have not ruined this with direct instruction and formal checks for understanding.

I have chosen specifically to run this technology class as a self-paced, project-based class.  That is, I will communicate to students at the beginning of every unit the “rubric” on which their grade will be based.  (For example, for Code Combat, I told students that they were required to complete a certain number of levels for an ‘A’, for a ‘B’, etc.).  From this point forward, and after as little direct instruction as I can get away with and still be certain that no one is completely confused, students are largely on their own to complete their work as they are able.  I float as a helper, but mostly do not offer help unless asked.  I feel that this is critical for students at this age level (and maybe every age level), as this builds so many excellent personal qualities. Among them, self-reliance, resourcefulness, and time management – and for those students who are excelling, a burgeoning sense of self-esteem and belief in themselves that no amount of direct instruction or checking for understanding could possibly have generated.  In fact, I think that these techniques would have poisoned the environment of exploration and discovery, and sharing, that most students are now thriving in.

I should know, because I taught mathematics in that old way for 9 years prior to this assignment.  But I never saw, in all of that time, as many happy student faces or as much authentic enthusiasm to succeed as I have seen in these past 3 months, as I have let students dictate the pace of their own learning and stretch to perform as they are comfortable.  I am thankful that my colleague, Mark Synnott, and I have found so many excellent, online resources that automatically track student progress and build into their systems of learning a continuous check for understanding in which students are not even aware that they are participating. I do not not need to test them to know that they are progressing and learning.  The fact that they have moved from one level to the next is all the evidence I need.

So, rather than feeling that I am abandoning good teaching in leaving behind that model of direct instruction and direct testing that is supposed to affirm whether students have learned what the teacher wants them to learn, I feel that I am embracing the best kind of teaching that is possible.

Which brings me to the most recent unit that students have completed, and easily the most successful in terms of engagement and achievement this year: the HTML/CSS course at Codecademy.  For the first time, students in this unit were faced with a blank screen and a command prompt.  Each lesson in the course provides a small chunk of new learning, for example a new tag or small set of tags, and then students are asked to type these new tags in the code console (of course in the proper order).  Students can see the effects of their efforts immediately in a mini-browser in the upper right portion of their screen, which gives them feedback as to the correctness of their code.

Students have responded to this unit in such a way that, as I think about it now, actually gives me chills.  It is the way that education should be, all the time and in every subject.  I have seen the most struggling students working hard to make progress; I have seen the most advanced students absolutely blow the doors off of my wildest expectations and far surpass them; I have seen large numbers of students helping their classmates and thereby deepen their own understanding; I have also witnessed a majority of students elect to work vs. take free time.  Let me repeat that again.  Last Friday was Halloween.  I was in costume, as were a number of students.  I had already told them that I did not expect that Friday would be a very productive day.  So, at the beginning of each class, I gave them a choice.  They could either continue to work, or do whatever they wanted on their devices.   In every class (keep in mind this is middle school), more than half of all students chose to work, and I had a steady stream of students coming up to my desk to ask for help in completing their HTML lessons.

So, if anyone asks, yes, this year is going very well!  I am thankful to my site administration and the district technology team, who together are encouraging me to take this path.  I am thankful that so much infrastructure is already in place, like 1:1 devices, excellent wi-fi, and a crack team of tech support.  All together, we are making the miracle happen: we are providing engaging content that excites and motivates students, and we are carving out the opportunities for them to take it is far as they possibly can.  AND THEY ARE.

Isn’t that what we all got into this business for in the first place?


Submitted by: Erik Anderson

If Haiku is the Windshield - Infinite Campus is the Rearview Mirror

Students and parents have always struggled with maintaining an effective way to keep on top of daily academic responsibilities. When our students were in elementary school, remaining informed was much easier for parents or guardians. In the younger grades, there is only one teacher to communicate with and therefore, one system of communicating daily homework, upcoming projects, and assessments.  In middle school, the use of a traditional student planner is a mixed bag of results. A planner works well for organized students but other students struggle when they are faced with multiple teachers who often use different systems for organizing their home to school communication. Of course, a traditional planner gets more complicated in high school. In high school, students have up to seven different teachers and in some cases teachers and parents are providing students less structure as they are expecting students to be more responsible and autonomous. The big question: Does the addition of online websites and apps for checking homework, assignments, grades, and attendance make all of this easier or more confusing? In the Perris Union High School District, we believe we have provided teachers, parents, and students with the technology to make this ongoing issue more manageable than ever.

Calendar
PUHSD is proud of its Scholar+ program. All students are issued a Chromebook and utilize the Haiku Learning Management System (LMS), the Infinite Campus Portal, and Google Apps for Education. These tools allow student and parents to have 24/7 access to assignments, grades, email, and attendance records. Although there is a learning curve for all educational stakeholders (including school personnel), once oriented on these platforms, most people find these advancements easy to use and very convenient. Parents and students are encouraged to think of Haiku as their “educational windshield,” where one can see forward, such as current and upcoming assignments. The Haiku LMS homepage displays a student’s classes and announcements from teachers about important dates and deadlines. In class, students access Haiku and go directly to the teacher’s Haiku page for each period. Once there, students can find the day’s presentation, assignments, quizzes, homework, notes, and other pertinent class information. While at home, students and parents can use Haiku to check for homework and study class materials. This is a proactive way for parents to check what is happening in their students classes and view which homework and class assignments have been assigned. Once again, think of Haiku LMS as the “windshield” since it is used to see what is happening currently and in the near future. PUHSD encourages parents to get their own Haiku accounts (instructions for setup), but a simple temporary workaround is for students and parents to log in at home together.

After you get in through a regular
computer, you may also download
the Campus Portal app on your
smartphone. Our District ID# is:
DMTLPK
If Haiku is the “windshield” Infinite Campus is the “rear view mirror.” Infinite Campus (IC) is PUHSD’s official student database. Although Haiku is an important tool for students and parents to keep up with the content of their classes, it is still vital to access the Infinite Campus Portal (IC Portal setup instructions). Parents who need to sign up for IC were given these instructions at recent Back-to-School events. Students were also given these instructions, complete with their activation key on subsequent days. Parents who still need these instructions are encouraged to call their school to have their specific instructions emailed to them. Although most students have already set up their IC accounts, students can get help with the Infinite Campus Portal from their counselors or their site’s technology coach. Families use IC to check for missing assignments, scores on individual assignments, in-progress grades, attendance, and to view and print unofficial transcripts. It is a powerful tool and is also available in a very convenient app for iPhone and Android smartphones.

This is a promising new era that PUHSD has embraced because it believes these improvements in accessing important class and school information will give all students and their families the tools needed to be successful.

Technology is the Great Equalizer in Special Education


Once regarded as expensive and scarce, the well-planned technological implementation at PUHSD in recent years has made resources available and accessible to students with disabilities like never before. As part of the Scholar+ teaching and learning initiative, PUHSD’s 1:1 Chromebook deployment is one such example of getting needed resources in the hands of students for daily use.

There are many teachers at PUHSD who have spent decades supporting students with disabilities who struggled to gain equitable access to the mainstream curriculum. At times, this uphill battle seemed insurmountable. Now, technology brought about by Scholar+ has been helping PUHSD students close this gap, increasing the possibilities for students with disabilities to equally participate in the general curriculum. The reality of students with disabilities at PUHSD having equitable access to learning experiences is one of the desired outcomes for Scholar+. It is great to see desired outcomes become a reality.

Scholar+ has provided accommodations to students with disabilities that were once expensive and rare. For instance, SpeakIt! is a Google Chrome extension that reads selected text using Text-to-Speech technology that has language auto-detection. SpeakIt! can read text in more than 50 languages and can assist students with learning disabilities and visual impairments to read text. Voicenote is also a Google Chrome extension that uses speech recognition software to take spoken words and convert them into typed words on the screen. Students with fine motor impairments who find it difficult to use a standard keyboard or grip a writing utensil can use Voicenote to complete written compositions. A glowing example of this is that recently a teacher sat down with a student who had visual impairments and was struggling with writing and worked to provide resources. After helping the student install Voicenote on the Chromebook, the student went from writing a paragraph in one hour to composing three pages in half the time. The student’s ability to participate in English class was transformed and this would not have been possible without Scholar+.

Video creation can be extremely beneficial to students with autism or those with more severe cognitive disabilities. There are a number of online tools that allow teachers to create cartoons, comics, screencasts, and live-action videos that can be used to create an assortment of helpful teaching and learning resources. These short demonstrative and informative videos can help students learn how to appropriately act in certain social situations, instruct students in an entertaining way about personal hygiene or safety, or reinforce appropriate behavior by depicting expected behavior. Our teachers are now using this technology to improve the lives of students.

Our students with disabilities live in incredible times where access to technology can result in life changing moments. Everyday, more and more of our students with disabilities are taking control of their lives through technology. Scholar+ at PUHSD continues to provide opportunities for students with disabilities to have equitable access to the curriculum and enrich their lives like never before. Technology is the great equalizer that is making all the difference.

Scholar✚: Transforming Education


Approximately two years ago, Perris Union High School District took its first public steps embarking on a journey that is changing the face of education in the region. The first public step was the unveiling of the Scholar+ teaching and learning initiative. There is much to be chronicled on Scholar+ and the exciting things happening at PUHSD and we want to share them. Our newly announced PUHSD blog will be the format to expand on the development, implementation, and future goals of Scholar+ as well as other district achievements.

It is an unfortunate truism in education that many school districts have a disjointed organizational structure. Often, divisions are working on different paths that are not connected to each other. That is not to say that the individual paths don't have merit or are wrong. It’s just that these paths often lack connections to each other. This truism is more apparent in the traditional model of school districts in which the Business Services/Technology Departments and Educational Services Departments are on different paths. Schools have hardworking, talented, and caring people working in these departments and there is no doubt their commitment to education is solid. But what great things can happen when the paths connect, intertwine, or become one?
   
PUHSD was no different in the traditional business/technology and curriculum arrangement. Excellent people and teams of people were thoughtfully doing the noble work so necessary in education. But something interesting happened. The word “interesting” does not do justice to the developments that unfolded. At PUHSD, the two roads started to meander into each other, briefly following a similar path but then breaking off. This intertwining happened often enough that the players became familiar with each other, trust was established, relationships were formed (some might say alliances were forged), and a new team started to emerge. All of these things allowed PUHSD to shed the tradition and what emerged was Scholar+.

There is a saying that “If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.” This encapsulates our philosophy and explains how PUHSD has been able to persevere with Scholar+. While planning, scheduling, and coordinating on Scholar+, we worked together. Hierarchy was suspended as to allow voices to be heard. We met in person and online, took advantage of office spaces and virtual spaces, and used the collaborative tools available to us as we traveled together.  With the conditions being set at PUHSD, it was time to define the focus. That focus was clearly on the learner. The term-or brand-Scholar+ was purposely selected as to cause every decision to be focused on the learner, our scholars at PUHSD. Some of the attributes we want our students to develop include being inquisitive, creative, motivated, collaborative, productive and innovative. All of these attributes and more are ones that can be found in the type of scholar needed for the modern world.  Also, the naming of  Scholar+ as the teaching and learning program included designating that term for our wireless network. The name Scholar+ is what the students, parents, staff and community see when they access our network and see our devices on campus and in the community.

But Scholar+ did not start with the creation of the brand.  The plan started with the careful crafting and creation of desired outcomes. It should not be missed that PUHSD did its research. We dove deep and wide into the best school programs and excellent research provided by experts in various fields and organizations. We took the wise recommendations to start with desired outcomes and moved forward on our journey. The elements of Scholar+ address the desired outcome of providing all students with the opportunity for 24/7 learning that is personalized and flexible. Other desired outcomes include students using 21st Century tools to do authentic work, the ability to collaborate and communicate effectively with peers, experts and their teachers, access libraries of digital content that provide multiple pathways to learning, pursue real-world issues and topics of deep interest, and understanding and practicing digital citizenship.  Lastly, Scholar+ ensures that PUHSD provides equitable access to learning experiences for all students and especially students in underserved populations—low-income and minority students, students with disabilities, and English language learners.

As you can see, PUHSD has a lot we want and need to share. We have not even scratched the surface of Scholar+ and the systemic improvements PUHSD is undergoing.  As we continue to blog about Scholar+ and PUHSD, you will find out more about the philosophical underpinnings, the players, the devices, the facilities, and much, much more.  Thank you for joining us and joining  this blog. We are glad to have you with us. Remember, “If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.”

Reblog - Touching Stories That Make Me Proud of Working in a 1:1 Device District


Original Author - Princess Choi:

I want to introduce you to my room. Inside my room, I have 36 students at any given time. I build relationships with 180 students everyday in this room. I don't know which ones are part of this data, but our School SARC says 90.6 percent of my students receive free or reduced price lunch. There was a time during my tenure in this school when I thought these students will not be able to compete against other students in this country. There are many reasons I felt that way, but that's not important because now I feel a little different.

The Chromebook is Mightier Than the Sword: History Students Become Heroes

History students in the Perris Union High School District can do more than adorn their classroom walls with cool projects and posters. PUHSD students join larger communities of activists, historians, and journalists to make the world a better place. In one class, students learned about serious human rights abuses, chose a topic that resonated with them, and created thought provoking Prezis and Google Slide Presentations that were posted on a Weebly website to educate each other and call for an end to such abuses. Thanks to the Scholar+ program, Chromebooks, and Google Apps for Education, these students collaborated with ease whether they were sitting in groups or were at home extending their learning.

In another project, students used their Chromebooks to learn important communication skills before participating in the nation’s largest collection of personal interviews, known as Storycorps: http://storycorpsu.org/. Students used their Chromebooks to listen to touching interviews done by other students, created their own questions, and practiced interviewing one another. Then, students were invited to interview classroom guests, such as Technology Director Joe Williams.

Finally, the flexibility allowed by the Haiku Learning Management System allowed very quick instructional pivots when historical parallels suddenly present themselves. For example, in February, 2014, World History students were learning about policy of appeasement leading up to World War II. When Russia, under the leadership of Vladimir Putin, invaded the Crimean Peninsula, Mr. Ashley was able to use this event comparatively in his class. Students took polls and then were required to create an “Internet Meme” over the event. Some students succeeded in making very creative GIFs illustrating the aggressive behavior.

There is a learning curve for both teachers and students, but it is becoming clear that when wielded correctly, the Chromebook is  mightier than the sword - at least for Scholar+ students.

Reblog - PUHSD #MathChat 1: Quadratic Catapults


Original Author - Jedidiah Butler:

Simple enough task;  make the ball land in the basket.

The task had to be simple so that we could get over 2000 students to participate.  We started small, and eventually involved all three of the comprehensive high schools in the Perris Union High School District, with a repeat visit to Perris High School.

This article is reposted with permission from Mr. Jedidiah Butler, the PUHSD Math Coach Teacher on Special Assignment. The original post can be found on his blog "Math Butler Blog"

Here's the summary of what happened.

Our STEM specialist Josh and I put together a single-period, hands-on activity that would engage students with mathematical modeling.

Attempt 1

When people think of quadratics, the hands on project that comes to mind seems to be projectile launching and falling.  With that in mind, Josh prepped the activity.

Josh did a first run with this activity in Princess Choi's classroom with Integrated Math 2 students. Ms. Choi has proven herself to be a teacher that takes chances and tries new things if they have promise to support and engage her students .  Without her, this activity would have probably never got past the planning stages.




Materials

The tools given to students  included:


Directions

First, students were shown how to use a catapult.  The catapults were made of expensive plastic, and used a program to launch it. The program was simple but not very intuitive for first time users.

Tasks


  1. Launch a ball on the floor and Find the typical distance and maximum height. 
  2. Launch off a table and make a basket.





Once the demo was finished, students gathered into groups and started running trials and taking measurements.  While students were running the activity, each group quickly realized that group work and collaboration were required to make this work.  It would take more than 1 student to launch the ball, measure the distance, measure the height, and retrieve the ball.  Some managed with just 3 in the group, but most were more comfortable with 4.
Ms. Choi, Josh, and myself facilitated the groups by asking questions on what they were doing, how well it was working, and if a more effective alternate method was possible.

Teacher: "What are you trying to do here?"
Student: "Measure the distance."
Teacher: "Which distance?"
Student: "The ground, to where it lands, oh and the height too."
Teacher: "So you're getting 2 measurements then?"

Conversations like this were abundant during the activity.  Pushing the students to articulate the process and reasoning to go with it was just as valuable as the typical math content.

Students were also given a worksheet to document their process.  I'd like to add that this worksheet was the first iteration and we improved significantly on it for the second round.

The shot for the basket

Time flew by and the bell crept up too quickly.  Students and facilitators were engaged to a point where time was merely an afterthought.  They saw that math can be more than just numbers. Students leaving didn't want to go and incoming students rushed to class once they  heard about the activity.

Even with this success of engaging the students, there were improvements to be made.  The directions needed simplifying and the supplemental worksheet needed more depth. Word spread quickly about this activity and more teachers and students wanted to try it out.  So we did.  In a really big way.

Amp It Up

Our first run had roughly 2-3 total classes with only 1 class at a time.  As interest grew, it looked like we would be doing the event for a full day with up to 3 classes running at the same time.  That was just the first round of follow up with Perris High.  The group was so big that we had to request use of the multi-purpose room for a full day.

We learned from the previous experience that the goal needed to be as simple as possible.  We focused on the second task only:

Make the ball go in the basket

There was a few conditions though.  The students had to launch it from the stage down to the floor and they only got 1 attempt at making the shot.  That's correct, only one shot for the basket.  As some felt immediately put off by a 1 shot deal, we clarified that there was more to it.  The students could have as many attempts as they wanted from the ground.  So practice was key.
Some questioned that shots from the ground were not going to be the same as shots from the platform.  This was the teachable moment.  The learning that an educator wants a student to realize from this experience is what happens when you change the height from which the ball is launched?  Does a projectile travel further, the same, or a shorter distance when launched higher?  It was odd to me that this was not intuitive for the students at first, only adding value and purpose to why we were doing such an activity.

Managing a room, maintaining Focus

The teachers for each of these classes were invaluable in managing a room with 100-120 students. To help keep the students on track with achieving the task of making the ball in the basket, I gave them 2 words to focus on: precise and consistent.

This gave us just enough structure to guide the actions and behaviors of the students as needed.  To be precise, the students needed to be particular with their measuring, not just guessing.  To be consistent, it wasn't enough to just do the practice once or even a few times. These words may be redundant, but for our students it proved as a valuable guide.



Students were given similar tools as before and had to apply some problem solving to figure out how to best use the tools.  For example, each group was only given 1 yard stick, yet they had to measure the height and distance for their trials.

Upgrades



The worksheet was redone to match current standards, incorporate multiple representations of the experience, and extend the understanding to apply the concept in a new situation.

Our district has students working 1:1 with Chromebooks.  To capitalize on that opportunity we had the new worksheet available digitally and an interactive Desmos Graph.  Some used these options while others stuck to their physical resources.  However the students completed the task, they were engaged, happy, and maintained high standards in their work throughout.  They did all of this while learning and applying the math from their class.  All 2000+ of them.


Who knew that shooting a little ball into a little basket could mean so much.

As we finished with the last class during the last period on the last day of the activity, Josh and I were exhausted.  It was enlightening to think how we finished compared to how we started.  The experience of having to scale it up for the masses forced us to look at the core concepts in the exploration.  The evolution of the supplemental material was also honed down to the essentials.  There was enough for the students to develop an understanding of the model through a few different representations, but any unnecessary tasks/prompts were whittled away.  The conversations that students had with peers and with teachers were what made this activity successful.  This activity was more than just practice on paper.  It was ScholarPlus.